So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the curren

help-global

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the curren

From:	Gautam Thaker
Subject:	So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the current limitations?
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:29:22 -0500

In release notes for 6.6.5 I read:

[DEPRECATED]
o gtags: the built-in C++ parser is deprecated, since it is not well maintained.
Currently, it is hard to say that GLOBAL supports C++ language.

What is state of C++ support? I really like being able to have my global/gtags/ggtags.el eco-system provide me C++ definitions AND references (where methods/functions are being called from.) universal-ctags, I don't believe it can find references.

What is the state of C++ support and what is the likely future?

Thanks.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the current limitations?, Gautam Thaker <=
- Re: So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the current limitations?, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2021/02/24
  - Re: So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the current limitations?, Joseph Garvin, 2021/02/25

Next by Date: why are "references" restricted to symbols for which we have definitions?
Next by thread: Re: So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the current limitations?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread