Re: [Help-glpk] Emulating the AMPL ord() function

[Jason Foster]

> While I understand your question, in the example that you gave do you really 
> need ord(i) < ord(j), or can you suffice with  i < j  (which seems to work 
> with your example)?  Often all you need is any consistent ordering and not 
> necessarily a specific one.

Agree completely.

So ... ummm ... does glpsol / glpk guarantee that for any given param or set 
the "VAR in SET" construct will have a consistent ordering across multiple uses?

Jason

P.S.  Thanks for the reply!