[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this code correct in the GMPL implementation ?
From: |
Andrew Makhorin |
Subject: |
Re: Is this code correct in the GMPL implementation ? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Aug 2020 15:46:44 +0300 |
On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 11:26 +0200, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Hello !
>
> This is my fourth time trying to replace the actual TUPLE struct
> representation https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/tree/new-tuple and
> I'm
> struggling again in understand/rewrite some parts of the code,
> mainly
> src/mpl/mpl3.c::saturate_set and other places.
>
> I'm asking for help to try to fix/rewrite the missing pieces on it,
> I
> hope that this changes once corrected would give a reduction in
> memory
> usage and probably execution time for GMPL.
>
> Thank you in advance for any help you can give !
>
> Cheers !
Please note that using nanbox makes the code non-portable.
The ANSI C Standard (ANSI/ISO 9899-1990 aka C89), which glpk conforms
to, says nothing about representation of floating-point objects.