[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
Lute Kamstra |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
10 Sep 2002 22:40:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Henrik Enberg <henrik+news@enberg.org> writes:
[...]
> The OP sent a multipart message with both html and plain text. In Gnus
> you could set `mm-discouraged-alternatives' to get rid of crappy html.
Ah yes, that works. I learned my new thing for today. Thanks.
Lute.
--
(spook) => "USCODE colonel ASO"
(insert-file-contents "~/.signature") => (error "`~/.signature' too rude")
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11