[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
D . Goel |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
12 Sep 2002 11:51:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
>
> Oooops... AFAIK there is no official release port of GNU Emacs to Cygwin...
> Is this not true anymore?? Is there now an official port of GNU Emacs 21.X to
> cygwin (downloadable binaries build with cygwin and installable by the cygwin
> setup)?
>
I built emacs21 on an NT a few months ago---using cygwin tools.. it
had pretty good instructions on how to go about it.
Also, the cygwin install itself probably has an "install emacs"
option--but now sure about that..
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, (continued)
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Sacha Chua, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, maierh, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?,
D . Goel <=
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Rodney Sparapani, 2002/09/11
Re: emacs or xemacs?, A. L. Meyers, 2002/09/14