[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?
From: |
Oliver Scholz |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken? |
Date: |
Thu, 08 May 2003 09:18:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) |
bk_usenet@yahoo.co.uk (BK) writes:
> Oliver Scholz <alkibiades@gmx.de> wrote ...
[...]
>> I set a Follow-up to alt.religion.emacs in my first post to this
>> particular subthread. If you hadn't ignored it, we would discuss this
>> now in the proper forum.
>
> Would you care to explain this?
>
> First, all I can see is "gnu.emacs.help" and "comp.sys.mac.apps", so I
> don't really understand what you mean by "follow up set to
> alt.religion.emacs"
I have not crossposted to alt.religion.emacs. Maybe that was a
mistake. I have added the line "Follow-up: alt.religion.emacs" to the
header of my post. This Follow-up header is supposed to cause a
recipient's newsreader to post follow-ups to a different newsgroup. I
believe that this is some RFC standard, but I don't know for sure. It
is common practise in many of the newsgroups I read to use this to
change the group if a discussion has become off-topic or is supected
to become off-topic. It is common to add line like "Follow up set to
..." or "F'up to: ..." to one's post to indicate to silent readers
that follow-ups are expected to appear in a different group.
> Secondly, I don't understand the "If you hadn't ignored it" part
> either, since I didn't see any other group. Rest assured, if I had, I
> would have removed the group. So, if there are any invisible things
> going on that I cannot see when using Google's web interface, I'd like
> to know about them.
[...]
I was not aware that the web interface in Google does not follow this
convention nor that you use it. So I assumed it was intentional. Sorry
for that.
Oliver
--
19 Floréal an 211 de la Révolution
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité!
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Ajanta, 2003/05/07
- Suggestion to BK, Ajanta, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, John Paul Wallington, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Kai Großjohann, 2003/05/10
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Phillip Lord, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Oliver Scholz, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?,
Oliver Scholz <=
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Barry Margolin, 2003/05/08
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Björn Lindström, 2003/05/08
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, niels freimann, 2003/05/07
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, David Kastrup, 2003/05/07
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07