[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:47:25 GMT |
In article <84u19puklz.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de>,
Kai Großjohann <kai.grossjohann@gmx.net> wrote:
>Barry Margolin <barry.margolin@level3.com> writes:
>
>> For those of us who don't use transient-mark-mode, how about C-u M-( or M--
>> M-( surrounding the region?
>
>Both already do something, but C-u 0 M-( is the same as M-( by
>default, I think. So that could be used.
What does giving a negative prefix to M-( do?
C-u M-( currently does the same thing as M-4 M-(, but there's precedent for
treating C-u as a special flag rather than just equivalent to a prefix of 4.
--
Barry Margolin, barry.margolin@level3.com
Level(3), Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Sandip Chitale, 2003/07/14
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Ilya Zakharevich, 2003/07/15