[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:40:19 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Pascal Bourguignon <spam@mouse-potato.com> writes:
> Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de> writes:
...
>> Currently, I use OpenBox. It's painful, but I can bear it.
>
> You should try clumpwm: it's written in Common-Lisp and modifiable on the fly.
Do you meant StumpWM?
It's eventually going to be a common lisp successor to ratpoison; not
as featureful yet, but still pretty cool.
Jay
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/16
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/21
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, John Sullivan, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/23
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/26