[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: outline-minor-mode-prefix doen't work?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: outline-minor-mode-prefix doen't work? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:20:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
William Xu <william.xwl@gmail.com> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> I repeat Stefan's question:
>>
>>>>>> Why do you need to (require 'outline)?
>>
>> You don't need to load outline real fast for the setting of
>> outline-minor-mode-prefix to have an effect.
>
> The point is that setting of outline-minor-mode-prefix should be done
> before loading outline.el, or more exactly, defining the keymap. Do we
> agree on this? If yes, adding (require 'outline) afterwards is just
> explicitly to guarantee this.
Nonsense. The require will do nothing if it has been loaded already,
and the effect of the setq will take place whenever outline eventually
gets loaded.
>> It is sufficient that it will be loaded at some point of time.
>
> This sufficiency depends on using some features like autoload,
> eval-after-load, in outline.el ?
Why would it?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Re: outline-minor-mode-prefix doen't work?, Zhang Wei, 2005/11/06