[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
From: |
Mathias Dahl |
Subject: |
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:28:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:
> Mathias Dahl <brakjoller@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>
>>> There are several ways you can do this. You can of course use the arrow
>>> keys, but it's generally more efficient in the long run to keep your
>>> hands in the standard position and use the commands C-p, C-b, C-f, and
>>> C-n. These characters are equivalent to the four arrow keys, like this:
>>
>> How about
>>
>> There are several ways you can do this. You can use the arrow
>> keys or you can use C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n. Generally, many find
>> the latter more efficient in the long run because it keeps your
>> hands in the standard position. These characters are equivalent
>> to the four arrow keys like this:
>
> There are several ways you can do this. You can use the arrow
> keys or you can use C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n. The latter can be
> more efficient in some situations, because it keeps your hands in
> the standard position. These characters are equivalent to the
> four arrow keys like this:
Even better :) Did you send this to gnu.emacs.devel too?
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, (continued)
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Tim Johnson, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Björn Lindström, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, don provan, 2005/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/19
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Per Abrahamsen, 2005/12/15
- RE: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Drew Adams, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?,
Mathias Dahl <=
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/16
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/15