[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu vs. xemacs
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: gnu vs. xemacs |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:32:52 +0100 |
* Hadron Quark (2006-12-29) writes:
> Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> In every emacs-* mailing lists, it has been extremely consistent to
>> use Linux and GNU/Linux i.e. Linux means the kernel and GNU/Linux is
>> the operating system that contains a Linux kernel.
>>
>> Making effort to preserve this consistence should be appreciated.
>
> This is simply not true.
>
> In nearly all but the kernel groups, "Linux" is known or accepted as
> Gnu/Linux.
Leo talked specifically about "emacs-* mailing lists" and those are
typically GNU lists. And on such lists "Linux" is often _not_
accepted as "GNU/Linux".
--
Ralf
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Leo, 2006/12/28
- "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), B. Smith-Mannschott, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Micha Feigin, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Alexey Pustyntsev, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2006/12/29
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/30
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Hadron Quark, 2006/12/29
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs,
Ralf Angeli <=
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, David Kastrup, 2006/12/27
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, insert name, 2006/12/28