[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: funcallable-p?
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: funcallable-p? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:16:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
daniel@bigwalter.net (Daniel Jensen) writes:
> Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> writes:
>
>> daniel@bigwalter.net (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>>
>>> You can use `subr-arity' to test for a special form.
>>
>> (subrp (symbol-function 'sin)) --> t
>
> What are you trying to say here?
>
> (subr-arity (symbol-function 'sin))
> => (1 . 1)
>
> (subr-arity (symbol-function 'and))
> => (0 . unevalled)
Sorry, I didn't know subr-arity, and I "read" that we could test for a
subr.
subr-arity sounds nice.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
Litter box not here.
You must have moved it again.
I'll poop in the sink.
- Re: funcallable-p?, (continued)
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/26
- RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/26
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/27
- RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/27
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/27
- RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/27
- Re: funcallable-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/27
Re: funcallable-p?, Daniel Jensen, 2007/08/26
RE: funcallable-p?, Drew Adams, 2007/08/26
Re: funcallable-p?, Johan Bockgård, 2007/08/26