[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: one shortcut next occurrence search
From: |
Elena |
Subject: |
Re: one shortcut next occurrence search |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:17:18 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Dec 24, 11:51 am, Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> Elena <egarr...@gmail.com> writes:
> > "C-s C-w" is not a keybinding. "C-s" runs isearch-forward, which puts
> > you into Isearch mode (as you can see into modeline), and you can
> > learn about its keybindings with "C-h m".
>
> > Otherwise, you can try "<prefix key> C-h", that is "C-c C-h", "C-x C-
> > h" and so on.
>
> Yes, especially C-h b is useful for finding out the bindings for the
> preceeding prefix. For example,
>
> C-s C-h b
>
> tells you all bindings of isearch.
I didn't know about the "C-h b". What's the difference? Why I have
to type "C-c C-h", "C-x C-h", etc. but "C-s C-h" does not work whilst
"C-s C-h b" does?
Funnily enough, according to "C-h c", "C-c C-h" and "C-x C-h" are not
bound to anything, neither is "C-h" alone (it is a prefix key).
Thanks.
Message not available
Message not availableRe: one shortcut next occurrence search,
Elena <=
Re: one shortcut next occurrence search, Elena, 2010/12/24
RE: one shortcut next occurrence search, Drew Adams, 2010/12/24
Message not availableRe: one shortcut next occurrence search, Richard Riley, 2010/12/24
Re: one shortcut next occurrence search, Teemu Likonen, 2010/12/25
Re: one shortcut next occurrence search, Bob Proulx, 2010/12/25
Re: one shortcut next occurrence search, Elena, 2010/12/23
Re: one shortcut next occurrence search, LanX, 2010/12/23