[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functi
From: |
José A . Romero L . |
Subject: |
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:21:42 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On 1 Jan, 23:50, girosenth <girose...@india.com> wrote:
(...)
> of computation, I am faced with how to break it into parts due to
> coupling in its parts. I was doing it inside let* to avoid setq
> (fair ?) but I have a function that must return a number or a string
(...)
Can't you simply use setq inside let?:
(setq blah 1)
(let ((blah))
(setq blah 2) ;; <-- This is not blah! ;)
(message "blah is %s" blah))
Cheers,
--
José A. Romero L.
escherdragon at gmail
"We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals."
(Quarry worker's creed)
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, girosenth, 2011/01/01
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, Chip Eastham, 2011/01/03
Re: How to improve the readability of ..., Steve Revilak, 2011/01/01
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, prad, 2011/01/01
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, Pascal Costanza, 2011/01/01
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, Bernd Paysan, 2011/01/03