|
From: | Cthun |
Subject: | Re: What's your favourite *under_publicized* editing feature ofEmacs? |
Date: | Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:35:16 -0500 |
User-agent: | MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 |
On 02/03/2011 3:39 AM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:43 pm, Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au> wrote:On 01/03/2011 5:51 PM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:On Mar 1, 5:52 am, Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au> wrote:Except that it's not called "COMMON LISP", Kastrup.Because it is not an acronymn, Cthun.What does that have to do with emacs, Dutchman?Why did the Cthun-bot talk about COMMON LISP and then revert to emacs?
Who is "Cthun-bot", Dutchman? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
Are they doing any testing at all?
What does your question have to do with Lisp, Dutchman?
The languages whose names are in all caps seem to be the ones that cause brain damage, Dutchman, and Common Lisp is not among them.It is always refreshing when the Cthun-bot can spit out a sentence that differs from it's normal small set
Who is "Cthun-bot", Dutchman? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
even if it doesn't make any sense.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |