[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Dec 2013 17:29:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
>> practical
>
> Practical cannot be dismissed.
No, that's what made me turn around on this. I would
even be in favour of the plethora of Linux distros if
they were just a bunch of configuration files.
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, (continued)
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/01
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/01
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/12/02
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/02
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/02
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/03
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/04
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations,
Emanuel Berg <=
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/01
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/12/04