[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a dark theme?
From: |
Alan Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: a dark theme? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 08:36:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) |
On 2014-07-18 03:08, Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> Yeah, but isn't that a contradiction in terms...? If it
> is just fetched from the gmail servers and treated like
> any other mail, why should you need any killer code at
> all? Why isn't the ordinary gnus- and message- faces at
> play? But feel free to drop this anytime as I don't use
> gmail myself and even my super-human curiosity is
> starting to wane...
I think the gmail bit is a red herring. These problematic emails are
html emails, which are rendering using shr. The gnus faces don't seem to
apply in this case, but shr options do.
Alan
--
OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7
pgprLLE2YE8c4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: a dark theme?, (continued)
- Re: a dark theme?, Sharon Kimble, 2014/07/17
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/17
- Re: a dark theme?, Sharon Kimble, 2014/07/17
- Re: a dark theme?, Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/18
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/18
- Re: a dark theme?, Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/21
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/21
- Re: a dark theme?, Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/23
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/23
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/21
- Re: a dark theme?,
Alan Schmitt <=
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/18
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/18
- Re: a dark theme?, Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/18
- Re: a dark theme?, Sharon Kimble, 2014/07/18
- Re: a dark theme?, Tassilo Horn, 2014/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/18
- Message not available
- Re: a dark theme?, Emanuel Berg, 2014/07/17