|
From: | Emanuel Berg |
Subject: | Re: Changing the factor used in universal arugment |
Date: | Sat, 24 Jun 2017 20:39:01 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
john@ankarstrom.se (John Ankarström) writes: > In retrospect, it might have been better if C-u was > internally represented in some other way, but that's > the way it is and it's too late to change it ... :-) What's wrong with 4? You typically want to do it *once* and then you want it to have an impact. 2 is too small to have an impact and 3 you can tap ba-ba-bam on the key fast enough. But I do agree it shouldn't be changed :) -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |