Re: Did `inline' used to do something else?

[Emanuel Berg]

YT wrote:

> But specific as it might be, there is no
> distinction between `inline' and `progn'
> visible here.

OK, found it - commented lines below is the
yanked result of evaluation:

    (symbol-plist 'inline)
    ;; (byte-compile byte-compile-progn
    ;;  byte-optimizer
    ;;  byte-optimize-inline-handler)

    (symbol-plist 'progn)
    ;; (lisp-indent-function 0
    ;;  byte-hunk-handler
    ;;  byte-compile-file-form-progn
    ;;  byte-compile byte-compile-progn
    ;;  gv-expander [...] [butlast last gv-get
    ;;  progn append] 10 " (fn DO &rest
    ;;  EXPS)"])

> I think this is only confusing... an alias
> should be another way of referring to
> something as a convenience, nothing more.

Agree 100%

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573