[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnus: Thread notes?
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: Gnus: Thread notes? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:44:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
> > FWIW, I would even find it acceptable if Gnorb would just silently
> > tick the relevant messages. It's easy enough to untick them again,
> > and maybe the need to do that explicitly would integrate well with
> > people's work flow. The idea is that messages you have operated on
> > with Gnorb are all important.
>
> I'd be annoyed by that behavior, but I can provide a customization
> option that will do it. I still like the idea of the Gnorb-specific
> limit function, though.
If you would get it all work conveniently without the need of background
ticking, it would be better and nicer, yes.
> This has been a multi-year headache. Right now I'm checking the value of
> `gnus-server-method-cache', and I don't know why your server isn't added
> to that. I'll add an explicit check for `gnus-secondary-select-methods',
> too.
I don't know, since I don't know the purpose of this cache.
If I replace that test so that it returns "my-gnorb-server" (hardcoded),
C-c v works, so it's indeed the wrong test. I guess you could instead
check `gnus-server-alist'?
Regards,
Michael.
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/24
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/11/25
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/26
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/11/27
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/28
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/11/28
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/29
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/11/29
- Re: Gnus: Thread notes?,
Michael Heerdegen <=
Re: Gnus: Thread notes?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/26