[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (interactive) call or form?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: (interactive) call or form? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:32:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> So let me tell you that while I'm not
> a prolific author with respect to journal
> papers, I can attest to this: not only
> copyediting in the TUGboat is superb, but
> (contrary to most scientific journals
> I published my papers in) it is _existent_
> at all.
Aha, you mean it like that. I meant it is
normal with mistakes in any text. You have
a mental image of what you want to convey.
When you read the text, the mental image gets
the upper hand and while you think you are
reading the text, you are actually surfing the
mental image. So the extreme case is reading
a crap text thinking it's great.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/08
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/04/08
- Message not available
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/08
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/04/09
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/09
Re: (interactive) call or form?, Emanuel Berg, 2018/04/08