[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer"
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer" |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2019 19:01:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 |
On 2019-07-31, at 14:18, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> No need, I guess. I'm on (relatively fresh) master and it's behaving
>> like this for some time already (I've just checked on emacs -Q).
>
> Good point.
>
>> While we're at that, sometimes I'd like to have also timestamps there.
>
> Hmm... I can't remember ever feeling like timestamps would be helpful.
> Do you have some scenario in mind?
I wrote about it another message, though I don't consider it essential
in any way - probably not worth the effort.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", (continued)
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Dan Sommers, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Yuri Khan, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer",
Marcin Borkowski <=