Re: Emacs as a translator's tool

[Emanuel Berg]

Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:

> Sure. You may want to take a look at the standard.

Do you have the actual set of rules?

I found this quote:

   SRX make use of the ICU Regular Expression
   syntax,^[3] but not all programming languages
   support all ICU expressions, making implementing
   SRX in some languages difficult or impossible.
   Java is an example of this. [1]

Heh, poor Java, well if I had the rules I'm pretty
confident we can implement them in one form or
another...

And I found a list

  * Pangolin is a free open-source SRX editor.
    <https://github.com/davidmason/Pangolin>
    
  * Ratel is a free open-source and cross-platform
    application to create and maintain SRX 2.0 files [...]
    <http://okapiframework.org/wiki/index.php?title=Ratel>
    
  * SRXEditor is a free open source cross-platform
    editor of segmentation rules by Maxprograms,
    designed to use Segmentation Rules eXchange (SRX) 2.0.
    <http://www.maxprograms.com/products/srxeditor.html> [1]

None of that is in the Debian repos what I can
see...

No mention of SRX in the [M]ELPAs and no (?) good
Google hits for Emacs and SRX.

Is it this file: [2] Then why the archive link? (from
the SRXEditor page, see URL above) Is this standard
obsoleted or unofficial, perhaps?


[1] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRX_Segmentation_Rules_eXchage_LISA_OSCAR_XML_based_Standard
[2] 
http://web.archive.org/web/20090709131535/http://www.lisa.org/fileadmin/standards/srx20.html

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal