Re: How should this profiler report interpreted?

[Emanuel Berg]

> Remember init? Run levels were hardcoded - in *file names*!
> Unbelievable. And when Debian went for systemd, all the
> derivates quickly followed suit. So much for "Ubuntu isn't
> Debian, Debian is loosing its significance and market share."
>
> And as I remember Debian was forked (for the nth time) [...]

Speaking of distributions...

Why can't we have one installer

idea ( Unix ) # no other option, hit RET
implementation ( Linux | BSD | ... ) # whatever
set of default software ( GNU | BSD | ...) # so much more versatility (options) 
with GNU so choose that
style ( TUI | GUI ) # not cut in rock, just an indicator to the installer 
software what to focus oohn just ahh little bit more
editor ( Emacs | Vim | ... ) # IMPORTANT, here you are supposed to choose Emacs!
desktop # isn't that parallel to the distro, what is it and who needs it? 
*skipped*
window system protocol ( Wayland | X11 ) # for the experts
window manager ( Openbox | openbsd-cwm ) # :) ha
etc etc
done

why do you need a distribution at all?

What has the distribution ever done for us???

tell me, why doesn't that work?

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal