[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2021 04:13:36 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) |
* Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
<help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> [2021-05-23 03:21]:
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/buc.el
>
> not done, how to make a pack of more than one file?
Read: (info "(elisp) Multi-file Packages")
> But these
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/caps-back.el
Cannot be installed, lacks file header
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/isbn-verify.el
Done
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/issn-verify.el
Done
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/iterate-files.el
Done
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/moggle.el
Done
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/wrap-search.el
Done
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-packs/xsel.el
Done
Keywords are often not proper in those.
In all your packages license is not properly referenced, label GPL3+
is not enough as label is not a license. You have to give more proper
copyright notice. Example is in C-h C-c search for words "How to
apply" but minimum I think, would be to provide a link to the
license. Best would be to provide license along with the software
especially if it is multie file package. Otherwise follow the
guideline. There are people without Internet, GPL3+ as label means
little. Benefiting people is best when you tell them:
How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs
If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.
To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest
to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
state the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least
the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.
<one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.>
Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.
If the program does terminal interaction, make it output a short
notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
<program> Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.
You may look into so many other Emacs packages.
> are done?
>
> also, check out other potential packs here:
>
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/gnus/
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/ide/
> https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/w3m/
Good.
Not all files need to be "Emacs packages" in the sense they can be
installed, they may be programs.
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, (continued)
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Jean Louis, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Jean Louis, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Jean Louis, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Jean Louis, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Jean Louis, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
- Re: New package for Sweden: package-header.el - was Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Emanuel Berg, 2021/05/22
Re: Interacting with minibuffer, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/22