Re: No standard library compilation

[Paul Pluzhnikov]

"ernesto" <ebasconp@gmail.com> writes:

> I want to develop a C++ application (or shared library) [using objects,
> inheritance, polymorphism, RTTI, templates, exception handling, etc.]
> but I do not want to use the libstdc++ library.

Why not?

Whatever the reason, you'll have to implement *a lot* of C++
runtime support, which is quite non-trivial.

> I know that I can avoid linking with the default libraries telling
> "-nodefaultlibs" to the compiler, but then a lot of errors are raised.
>
> So, what basic methods should I implement in order to have full C++
> features on my application without using the libstdc++?

Whichever methods are reported as unresolved when you link with
-nodefaultlibs.

Cheers,
-- 
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.