[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [g++-4.1] Strange problem with overloading
From: |
Armel Asselin |
Subject: |
Re: [g++-4.1] Strange problem with overloading |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:05:45 +0200 |
> Furthermore, according to the ISO standard C++ (ยง13.4 - Address of an
> overloaded function):
>
> "A use of an overloaded function name without arguments is resolved in
> certain contexts to a function, a pointer to function or a pointer to
> member function for a specific function from the overload set. A func-
> tion template name is considered to name a set of overloaded functions
> in such contexts. The function selected is the one whose type matches
> the target type required in the context. The target can be [...] an
> explicit type conversion."
yes i understand the same as you here.
there seems to be a difference between the standard and the
implementations...
Armel