[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: opening twice with O_RDWR
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: opening twice with O_RDWR |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:10:26 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) |
Mike - EMAIL IGNORED <m_d_berger_1900@yahoo.com> writes:
> My purpose is not relevant,
It is, if you want a useful answer.
> but I assure you that the requirement is correctly stated.
Where did you state your requirements? I must have missed that.
So far all I've seen is incoherent "when I do this, result is not
what I expect".
> I confirmed that I can open the file O_RDWR simultaneously from
> two processes.
Yes, that's correct on UNIX; but not on Win32.
Note that (AFAICT) you never mentioned two processes before this
point, so the answers you've got related to a *single* process.
> Seems to me like a good way to make a mess of a file.
If you want multiple processes to cooperate on writing a single file,
the proper way to achive that is with "advisory file locking"; see
"man flock".
> I guess I will use a locking file opened from a singleton.
This approach has the problem that if "lock holder" dies, then no
other process can do anything until "manual" cleanup. Advisory
file locking avoids that -- the locks are cleaned by kernel when
the process dies.
Also, whether the locking file is opened from singleton or not is
irrelevant -- singleton doesn't help you in any way that I can see
(given your statement of the problem so far), and singleton doesn't
work across processes.
Finally, may I suggest some light reading for the New Year:
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
- opening twice with O_RDWR, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED, 2006/12/30
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/12/31
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED, 2006/12/31
- Message not available
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/12/31
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED, 2006/12/31
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR,
Paul Pluzhnikov <=
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/12/31
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED, 2006/12/31
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/12/31
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Mike - EMAIL IGNORED, 2006/12/31
- Re: opening twice with O_RDWR, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/12/31