Re: SCRAM methods

[Simon Josefsson]

Jeremy Harris <address@hidden> writes:

> On 06/01/2020 11:06, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Compatibility with other SASL libraries is also a factor: I see that
>> Cyrus SASL supports storing b64-encoded ServerKey/StoredKey on the
>> server side.  So we should support that too.
>
> There's also mention in RFC 5803, going with the 4-tuple
> (iter-count, salt, stored-key, server-key) for storage on the
> server.

Thanks for the pointer -- that made me decide to use base64 for
ServerKey/StoredKey.

Please try version 1.9.1 and tell me if it does what you want!  There
are new properties for ServerKey/StoredKey now.

/Simon

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature