|
From: | Catonano |
Subject: | Re: is it me ? |
Date: | Sun, 14 May 2017 09:16:29 +0200 |
Hi, I just posted (and ccd you) my setup on another thread. Please letOn 05/09/2017 at 18:44 Catonano writes:
> 2017-05-07 14:12 GMT+02:00 myglc2 <address@hidden>:
>
> On 05/06/2017 at 09:33 Catonano writes:
>
> > 2017-05-06 4:07 GMT+02:00 myglc2 <address@hidden>:
> >
> > On 05/05/2017 at 18:01 Catonano writes:
> >
> > > 2017-05-03 21:08 GMT+02:00 myglc2 <address@hidden>:
> > >
> > > On 05/03/2017 at 18:05 Catonano writes:
> > >
> > > > 2017-05-02 20:58 GMT+02:00 myglc2 <address@hidden>:
> > > >
> > > > As it stands, your video is a great sanity check for someone wondering
> > > > if their emacs-guix environment is working properly. It is also a great
> > > > demonstration of how easy it is for a guix user to see and, with a git
> > > > checkout, modify a package.
> > > >
> > > > If you expanded it a bit to illustrate a few
> > > > more guix-edit/geiser features, it could be a great addition to the
> > > > guix-video-verse, and, IMO, a good thing to add to www.gnu.or
> > > >
> > > > Which eatures, exactly, you would like to be showed ?
> > >
> > > How about a scenario like this, all done from within emacs-guix running
> > > against a git checkout ...
> > >
> > > - find a package
> > >
> > > - install it
> > >
> > > - observe how it is working
> > >
> > > - consider changing a config flag
> > >
> > > - 'M-x Guix edit <package>'
> > >
> > > - download the source: 'C-u . s'
> > >
> > > I didn't kknow this one !
> > >
> > > - copy the package source out of the store (there is probably a better
> > > thing to do here)
> > >
> > > - in <package> source: './configure --help' to see config options
> > >
> > > - 'M-x Guix edit <package>' & modify #:configure-flags
> > >
> > > I think you can't modify a package in place. In fact, with guix edit
> > > it gets open as ead only
> > >
> > > As far as I understand, you should clone it locally, edit the copy in that clone, build it, install it with ./pre-inst-env in that clone
> > >
> > > If that's not too pettifogging for you, i could try
> >
> > Well, the scenario I outlined assumed running from a 'guix git checkout'
> >
> > No. I don't know how to run the Emacs guix-* commands on a checkout
> >
> > because I had the impression that you were running that way. But it may
> > be overkill for many users and it really might be better to create a
> > demo using a 'guix pull' setup. This could focus on using emacs-guix to
> > find, build, install, and inspect packages.
> >
> > That I can do
> >
> > It could also demonstrate
> > editing the system config, reconfiguring the system, creating a user
> > manifest and running 'guix package -m user.scm'
> >
> > That, I'm not sure I can do. I never created a manifest and I never run guix pakage - a-file.scm
> >
> > Would you mind to write done the relevant commands for me ?
>
> I have attached the user config manifest I am currently using. I apply
> it with ...
>
> guix package -m g1.scm
>
> ... you can also invoke this using the emacs-guix 'M-x guix' popup,
> which might be nicer to show in the demo.
>
> Oh I see now. Thanks !
>
> > I hope someone reading this will suggest such a package ;-)
> >
> > Right, I'm open to suggestions
> >
> > > - build the package: 'C-u . b'
> > >
> > > This one, for example, would require you to run the emacs-guix facilities on a local clone and I don't know how to do that
> > >
> > > I remember Ludo doing this in a footage but I could use a reminder.
> > >
> > > Thanks again
> >
> > Right. And I am happy to share my git checkout config with you if that
> > would help.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand, here.
>
> I mean that I am running guix from a git checkout. There are a few
> different approaches to doing this. I can outline the approach that I
> use when you want it.
>
> Yes, I' d like you to outline the approaches you are referring
> to. Thanks
me know if you have questions.
> What I mean is that if I invoke the Emacs Guix commands, they will
> show the host guix installation
I run on a headless server, so I don't have personal experience with a
desktop installation, but I don't believe the limitation you describe
actually exists.
Please try the setup that I posted. I think you will find that it allows
you to do this.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |