[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Docker image inflation
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Docker image inflation |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2020 20:21:08 +0200 |
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>> How else would you suggest that it be done? It would be nice if `guix
>> system docker-image`
>> took `--branch` and `--commit` options to build a container from a
>> well-defined Guix check-in
>> state, but that doesn't seem to be the case. And in any case - too slow.
>> The point here is to
>> leverage daily incremental pulls to keep data transfer and build times down.
>
> --branch and --commit would be passed to `guix pull`, and then you'd run
> `guix system docker-image` based on that.
There is also 'guix time-machine --commit=abc123 -- system docker-image'.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/27
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/28
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation,
Marius Bakke <=
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29