[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem with common lisp
From: |
Guillaume Le Vaillant |
Subject: |
Re: problem with common lisp |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:27:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 |
Adam Kandur via <help-guix@gnu.org> skribis:
> hi everyone!
> recently i started getting this error when i try to build any sbcl package:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> starting phase `build'
> Invoking sbcl:
> "/gnu/store/48v5srksa9nkp4hh527l6rb08pigy1bw-sbcl-2.0.9/bin/sbcl"
> "--non-interactive" "--eval" "(require :asdf)" "--eval" "(asdf:load-asd
> (truename
> \"/gnu/store/fgfag09f1amsk82bs6jmg9h4rv6hqb94-sbcl-deploy-0.0.0-1.59fd497/share/common-lisp/sbcl-source/deploy/deploy.asd\")
> :name \"deploy\")" "--eval" "(asdf:operate (quote asdf:compile-bundle-op)
> \"deploy\")"
> This is SBCL 2.0.9, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
> More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.
>
> SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
> It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
> BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
> distribution for more information.
> fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 15 tid 15:
> Unhandled SIGILL at 0x52000e9d.
>
> Error opening /dev/tty: No such device or address
> Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment.
> ldb> command
> "/gnu/store/48v5srksa9nkp4hh527l6rb08pigy1bw-sbcl-2.0.9/bin/sbcl"
> "--non-interactive" "--eval" "(require :asdf)" "--eval" "(asdf:load-asd
> (truename
> \"/gnu/store/fgfag09f1amsk82bs6jmg9h4rv6hqb94-sbcl-deploy-0.0.0-1.59fd497/share/common-lisp/sbcl-source/deploy/deploy.asd\")
> :name \"deploy\")" "--eval" "(asdf:operate (quote asdf:compile-bundle-op)
> \"deploy\")" failed with status 1
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> dont understand what went wrong, package definitions are unchanged
Hi,
The "Unhandled SIGILL at 0x52000e9d" error looks like the one in [1].
You could try downgrading sbcl to 2.0.8 to see if the error disappears.
[1]
https://www.reddit.com/r/sbcl/comments/j824cs/does_binary_209_require_some_fancy_x86/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- problem with common lisp, Adam Kandur, 2020/10/21
- Re: problem with common lisp, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- Message not available
- Re: problem with common lisp, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- Re: problem with common lisp, Adam Kandur, 2020/10/24
- Re: problem with common lisp, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/24
- Re: problem with common lisp, Adam Kandur, 2020/10/24
- Re: problem with common lisp, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/24
Re: problem with common lisp,
Guillaume Le Vaillant <=