[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Avoiding PYTHONPATH - latest?
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Avoiding PYTHONPATH - latest? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:05:58 +0100 |
Hi,
I have not re-read all the discussion about PYTHONPATH and co.
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 00:22, Phil <phil@beadling.co.uk> wrote:
> But the current PYTHONPATH implementation immediately runs into problems
> when you use venvs for development, via the cannonical "pip install -e
> .". The use of PYTHONPATH means that venvs are not created pure, they
> inherit Guix's python env which is the exact opposite to what any
> non-Guix python developer would expect.
Just to understand, is your point to be able to mix both “pip install“
and “guix install”? If yes, it appears to me a bad idea, choose one or
the other.
> I was wondering what the current thoughts were on how Guix could
> workaround using PYTHONPATH to set base system paths?
Well, I do not remember more than the attempt of GUIX_PYTHONPATH.
All the best,
simon