[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2)
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2) |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Mar 2021 13:06:07 +0100 |
Hi Julien,
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 22:04, Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> wrote:
> Le 20 mars 2021 20:34:48 GMT-04:00, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
> a écrit
>>You loose what I wrote: more dependencies and less discoverability. :-)
>
> Why more dependencies? There are either the same amount if you want coq:ide,
> or less than before if you don't.
*more dependencies when you build it. I agree that when the substitute
is available, mutlioutput saves resources.
Cheers,
simon
- Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2), yasu, 2021/03/20
- Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2), Julien Lepiller, 2021/03/20
- Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2), yasu, 2021/03/20
- Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2), zimoun, 2021/03/20
- Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2), Julien Lepiller, 2021/03/20
- Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2), zimoun, 2021/03/20
- Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2), Julien Lepiller, 2021/03/20
- Re: Bug? coqide missing? (in package coq, version 8.11.2),
zimoun <=