[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:58:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 28.0.50 |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> Therefore, since your question is rooted from GWL:
>
> I need to specify the package programmatically as a string in
> Guile. More specifically in the process packages field of Guix
> Workflow Language.
>
> maybe GWL could also accept a symbol instead of a name string. Well, I
> have not used GWL since many months and I do not remember but I think it
> is doable. Ricardo?
GWL accepts specifications or package values, so you could use (@ (my
packages foo) gcc) to prefer that over some other package with the same
name.
--
Ricardo
- Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/21
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Maxim Cournoyer, 2022/04/22
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, zimoun, 2022/04/28
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/28
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/04/28
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/28
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/28
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, zimoun, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Olivier Dion, 2022/04/29
- Re: Questions regarding substitutes with debug output, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/04/29