[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:44:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
> > Let us take a look at what others have done. E.g.:
> >
> > - http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/Year-2000/2000-23/0791.html
>
> Have you actually read the discussion?
Yes.
> It doesn't seem to be helpful to us.
> Busy is a concept that is defined by translators themselve. We hold (or
> should hold) ports to the underlying filesystems, so they will all be
> "busy".
They talk about what stat should return and a few other issues that I
felt were related.
> If you just wanted to point out that there are other union mounts
> implementations, well, that's true.
Admittedly, that was one of my goals.
> The BSD guys have one, too.
From what I understand, theirs is a bit different in so far as they have
a live filesystem backed by a static, read-only, file system, for, e.g.,
having the root filesystem on a cd and making a small ramdisk where
changes are stored.
pgp8DQ88DEI9E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: ShadowFS (status), (continued)
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Neal H Walfield <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26