[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
|
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
|
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
|
Date: |
26 Aug 2001 16:51:37 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> This is interesting. So you suggest the shadowfs should just
> browse through the directories and give an appropriate retry name?
Exactly. There may be cases where this gets the semantics curiously
wrong. In that case, I'm happy to tweak the interfaces to make it
right. We shouldn't need to do the way Moritz's current version does
it.
- Re: ShadowFS (status), (continued)
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Steven Barker, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/02