[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Improving Hurd

From: Jeroen Dekkers
Subject: Re: Improving Hurd
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:11:17 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Maybe I should try to look if I didn't have any unfinished sentences
before pressing the send button.

On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:35:21PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:46:17PM +0200, Jan Atle Ramsli wrote:
> > Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> > > I wonder why so many people talk that Hurd will not be able to do
> > > anything sensible soon instead of improving it.
> > 
> > I think you may find that this will improve with the change from Mach to
> > L4.
> What will improve? I don't think that the change to L4 will improve
> anything, at least not in the beginning. Don't expect that the Hurd
> just turns in something magically superior when it runs on 
... L4.
> > But imagine if the first year had been used to analyze and specify it.
> The first year of what? And to analyze and specify what? If you want
> to give critic, give good constructive critic instead of some 
... not very clear utterances.

Jeroen Dekkers
Jabber supporter - Jabber ID:
Debian GNU supporter -
IRC: jeroen@openprojects

Attachment: pgpBwAHlBtRqR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]