Re: glibc for the hurd

[Robert Millan]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:15:02PM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> 
> I wrote a small test program and linked it statically to libc. Result :
> ioperm fails with : Function not implemented. Looking at the source of
> glibc explains why :
> 
> int
> ioperm (unsigned long int from, unsigned long int num, int turn_on)
> {
> #if ! HAVE_I386_IO_PERM_MODIFY
>   return __hurd_fail (ENOSYS);
> #else
>   error_t err;
>   device_t devmaster;
> 
> So rebuild glibc with HAVE_I386_IO_PERM_MODIFY I guess :)

IIRC latest CVS lists ioperm-related changes in configure.in, i think
that version should work. anyone has tried it?

-- 
Robert Millan

make: *** No rule to make target `war'.  Stop.

Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide