[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc for the hurd
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: glibc for the hurd |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:42:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:15:02PM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
>
> I wrote a small test program and linked it statically to libc. Result :
> ioperm fails with : Function not implemented. Looking at the source of
> glibc explains why :
>
> int
> ioperm (unsigned long int from, unsigned long int num, int turn_on)
> {
> #if ! HAVE_I386_IO_PERM_MODIFY
> return __hurd_fail (ENOSYS);
> #else
> error_t err;
> device_t devmaster;
>
> So rebuild glibc with HAVE_I386_IO_PERM_MODIFY I guess :)
IIRC latest CVS lists ioperm-related changes in configure.in, i think
that version should work. anyone has tried it?
--
Robert Millan
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop.
Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide
- Re: glibc for the hurd,
Robert Millan <=