help-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: First Boot PCIE graphics install docs? (panic alloc pci memory faile


From: Thomas Schwinge
Subject: Re: First Boot PCIE graphics install docs? (panic alloc pci memory failed)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:41:42 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

Hello!

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:41:19PM -0400, Roland J Rankin Jr wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 23:23 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:00:42PM -0400, Roland J Rankin Jr wrote:
> > > I'm getting a 
> > > gnu mach 1.3 
> > > panic alloc pci memory failed
> > 
> > Am I guessing correctly that you have 1 GiB of ram or more?
>
> Yes you are correct.
> I have 1.5 gig. 

> I think I've resolved to installing it on a lesser machine that just
> became available, while I am trying to figure it out.
> 
> If that gives me problems and tackle the bigger box after I understand
> the mechanics a bit better. 

You could also (on the box with 1.5 GiB of ram) use a GRUB command to
limit the amount of memory GNU Mach will see.  (Limit it to something
around 700 MiB.)  The command is called `uppermem', I think.  Or you can
wait for the next upload of the Debian gnumach package, which will then
have this conflicting patch removed.


> > There is a conflict between a patch that is in the Debian gnumach package
> > and a patch that was installed into the main source tree to make systems
> > with somewhere below 1 GiB of ram and more boot at all.  See
> > <http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?4818#comment3>.  Debian people: perhaps
> > this patch should be removed from the Debian package for now?
> 
> I noticed you added debian-hurd to the reply list.

I tried to, but the <debian-hurd@gnu.org> redirection doesn't seem to
work anymore.

> I hope that means that your patch question is for them

It was, yes.


Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]