[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of the Hurd ?
From: |
massimo s. |
Subject: |
Re: Status of the Hurd ? |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:18:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070123) |
Alfred M. Szmidt ha scritto:
> > But promoting a system a system that can't even handle a
> > recompile of itself seems like inflicting damage on yourself;
> > this applies to Debian as well.
>
> huh? can't Debian recompile itself?!
>
> Without a alot of reboots between compiles, no.
Why? I use a gnu/linux Gentoo system, and it indeed can recompile itself
almost without a hitch (I just did it a month ago when upgrading to GCC
4.x from GCC 3.x) and surely with no more than a reboot for
recompiling/restarting the kernel.
Sure Gentoo is designed for self-recompilation, but it's matter of
managing scripts.
What stops Debian from doing the same?
m.
- Documentation (was: Status of the Hurd ?), (continued)
- Documentation (was: Status of the Hurd ?), Thomas Schwinge, 2007/02/06
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/02/03
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, Andrea Bolognani, 2007/02/03
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/02/03
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, Xavier Maillard, 2007/02/03
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/02/06
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/02/06
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, massimo s., 2007/02/06
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/02/06
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?,
massimo s. <=
- Re: Status of the Hurd ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/02/07