[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: which SHELL should i do ?

From: arnuld
Subject: Re: which SHELL should i do ?
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:41:15 +0530

On 7/12/07, Christopher Browne <> wrote:

If all you care about is scripts that you'll be using yourself, then
zsh is a fine choice.

But if you want to write shell scripts that you would consider
contributing to the Hurd project, I think you'll find that Bash is a
preferable choice, as we already know that Bash is included, by

ok, i will do bash then :-)

Unfortunately, for him to change subjects like that *does* express
some arrogance.  In effect, he's saying:

  "You were asking some question; I don't care to respond to that; I
   think it's more important to promote my agenda."

Also unfortunately, this approach causes people to "get their backs
up" about this.  They might well be thankful for the FSF
contributions; they didn't get around to expressing it before he
demanded it.  And people don't necessarily like such demands...

i did not find any arrogance when i read that. if you go to any
corporate like Prudential, Eureka Forbes, Standard Chartered Bank  (to
give some example of MNCs) and meet any managerial person there then
he will talk in manner which is worse than RMS's way. i think ROMS is
just being logical here in his reply. i have worked in corporate
environment and i assure you they talk in a way that i think is much
worse than RMS way or my way, th way i am replying, for that matters.
if this is what you call arrogance then what will you call the way of
communication of corporate bosses. by my yardstick, they are highly
selfish and  arrogant.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]