[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libidn2 license

From: Simon Josefsson
Subject: Re: libidn2 license
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 12:21:54 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>  The license included in libidn2 COPYING is the GPLv3 license, whereas
> the library seems to be dual LGPLv3+GPLv2 licensed according to:
> That most likely would prompt distributors to mark the library as
> gplv3 (in fact fedora marks it as such), even though it is not.
> I think it would be more clear if the COPYING of LGPLv3 and GPLv2 were
> also included as with libidn library.

Hi.  Good point, done in:


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]