Re: Enhancement of conditionals?

[Noel Yap]

Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> 
> "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > That might be true, but Lisp is really a very good language for a make
> > scripting language, since much of make's behavior, at least in terms of
> > expansion of variables, etc. is somewhat Lisp-like already.
> 
> Just a thought: rather than adding a lisp-like language to make wouldn't
> it be easier to implement make-like inference system in lisp?
> 
> Comments?

The meat of make is rule-based so I would think that replacing this with a 
functional programming language would not be a good thing.

MTC,
Noel
-- 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.