|
From: | Noel Yap |
Subject: | Re: trouble with order rules in implicit rules |
Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:22:46 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040212) |
Boris Kolpackov wrote:
"Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:I am planning to implement a "shortest stem" matching for equally applicable implicit rules. Do you think that would be good definitionof a "better-matching"?
How is "shortest stem" defined? Thanks, Noel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |