[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE?
From: |
Torsten Mohr |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:24:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8 |
Hi,
> tm> The thread ended then, are plans to embed a script language dead?
>
> Not at all. This is still definitely planned
>
> tm> Or are there activities to do this?
>
> There have been some basic attempts. Integrating Guile at a basic level
> isn't that hard, but also is only marginally more useful than $(shell
> ...) for example. The real question is what kinds of integrations with
> GNU make "internals" we want to allow, and that discussion hasn't been
> held yet.
Would it be a good idea to first implement guile "just as it is"?
I see some benefits for me in this, as i could start to write some
functions in guile and get known to it. Making more internals of
"make" available to guile could maybe be added later?
Also, some $(shell ) incompatibilities could be worked around.
Best regards,
Torsten.
- GUILE?, Torsten Mohr, 2005/09/08
- Re: GUILE?, Paul D. Smith, 2005/09/08
- Re: GUILE?,
Torsten Mohr <=