help-make
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Does "whitespace" have an explicit definition?


From: J.T. Conklin
Subject: Does "whitespace" have an explicit definition?
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:17:41 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix)

While playing around trying to find a solution to iterate through a
multi-line variable by lines I wrote about the other day, I discovered
newlines don't seem to be considered whitespace in text functions. 

For example, with the following definition of FOO

    define FOO
    foo abc
    bar xyz
    endef

In GNU Make 3.81, $(words $(FOO)) expands to 3, $(word 1,$(FOO)) to
"foo", $(word 2,$(FOO)) to "abc\nbar", and $(word 3,$(FOO)) to "xyz".

Is this intentional?  I went through the manual and examined each
place the word "whitespace" was used and didn't find a gmake specific
definition. As such, my expectation was that the common definition of
whitespace: space, horizontal tab, carriage return, newline, form
feed, and vertical tab characters would be used, at least as far as
variable expansion for function arguments is concerned.

    --jtc

-- 
J.T. Conklin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]