[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-smalltalk] Terminating the root CallinProcess (was Re: #value sent
From: |
Tony Garnock-Jones |
Subject: |
[Help-smalltalk] Terminating the root CallinProcess (was Re: #value sent by cCall?) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:15:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (X11/20071210) |
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> No, terminate is not abrupt at all. It works by raising a signal that
> does its way up to this signal handler:
Is it permitted to terminate the "root" CallinProcess?
It seems that it is already dead! which could be the cause of the fault
I was seeing? I also have a test case that does Something Weird, but I'm
not sure whether it's a problem with my code or with the system. I'll
attach it in a separate message.
~$ gst
GNU Smalltalk ready
st> Processor activeProcess.
CallinProcess('call-in process' at userSchedulingPriority, terminated)
st> Processor activeProcess terminate.
CallinProcess('call-in process' at userSchedulingPriority, terminated)
st> Processor activeProcess terminate.
CallinProcess('call-in process' at userSchedulingPriority, terminated)
st>
Tony
--
[][][] Tony Garnock-Jones | Mob: +44 (0)7905 974 211
[][] LShift Ltd | Tel: +44 (0)20 7729 7060
[] [] http://www.lshift.net/ | Email: address@hidden