help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Help-smalltalk] Question regarding the parser(s)


From: Holger Freyther
Subject: [Help-smalltalk] Question regarding the parser(s)
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:21:07 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1

Hi Paolo,

I try to come up with a test case for my parser issue and I am a bit confused
and maybe you can help me out.

1.) if I use FileStream fileIn it will end at a primitive and will always
use the internal C Smalltalk parser?!

2.) Behavior evaluate: 'Object subclass: Foo'. In the default implementation
this will be wrapped by a 'DoIt [ ^ [', code, ']]' and then executed?
Internally this will be passed to compile which should end in
VMpr_Behavior_primCompile?

Now the weird part is, that part does not appear to know about GST Syntax.

'Object subclass: Foo' does not work (this one needs a symbol)
'Object subclass: #Foo' does work
'Object subclass: #Foo []' does not work
'Object subclass: #Foo!' does work.. returns #Foo

is that a bug?

3.)
  PackageLoader fileInPackage: 'Compiler'.
  Behavior evaluate: 'Object subclass: #Foo3', returns nil and not
  Foo3 as without the Compiler.



So my question so far is:
        a) Should GST Syntax work inside the evaluate?
        b) Should the Compiler return the (last?) class it created?

as usual, thanks a lot.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]