[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stampede hd0*
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: stampede hd0* |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:57:51 -0500 (EST) |
> > I am concerned about the handling of S_ITRANS bits in other places. I have
> > not checked thoroughly, but I suspect more inconsistencies.
> > e.g. diskfs_create_node calls do not mask out the S_ITRANS bits and so they
> > can wind up in dn_stat.st_mode when diskfs_read_node was never called.
>
> Yeah, there may be some problems like that.
You're a helpful bugger, aren't you? Care to comment on which bits ought
to be possibly set in a diskfs_create_node call?
Also, the sticky bit is cleared in dir-lookup/dir-mkfile but not in
dir-mkdir. Should every place that masks off S_IFMT|S_ISPARE be consistent?
Re: stampede hd0*, Roland McGrath, 2002/01/03